Corporate Personhood was created on a shaky legal foundation, but it's likely to get worse as the US Supreme Court looks at the issue. They're likely to grant corporations even more free speech rights, further unfettering their ability to influence public policy.
Stephen Colbert tackled this subject in recent shows, I have to say I do not recall the concept of corporate personhood being questioned in the media in ... well, forever.
But even more surprisingly, Justice Sotomayor recently stated that:
"... the majority might have it all wrong -- and that instead the court should reconsider the 19th century rulings that first afforded corporations the same rights flesh-and-blood people have.
Judges "created corporations as persons, gave birth to corporations as persons," she said. "There could be an argument made that that was the court's error to start with...[imbuing] a creature of state law with human characteristics."
If there was a unified anarchist political party, I'd have to guess that ending corporate personhood would be at the top of the party platform.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Corporate Personhood
Posted by Erik at 10:36 PM
Tags: anarchism, anarchist public policy, corporate personhood
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 Comments, Post a Comment:
JOE BLOW is a corporation, while Joe Blow is a flesh and blood human being. This corporation is created with a Birth Certificate. Look up the definition of "certificate". When the goobermint corresponds with JOE BLOW, unfortunatly Joe {the human} thinks it is addressed to him, opens it and responds.
Post a Comment